Σελίδες

Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Gennadios. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Gennadios. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Σάββατο 13 Οκτωβρίου 2018

9 - Is the Eastern Party dead in Greece?







9 - Is the Eastern Party dead in Greece?

I see that Erdogan played his hand with Brunson pretty well.  I always thought that he was going to return Brunson eventually. just as he returned the lost Greek soldiers at the border in Evros.  Brunson was tried and convicted, but released because of his time in jail already spent…..  Standing up the US, Erdogan’s popularity surged.  US Turkish relations are currently a mess almost impossible to entangle.  The Turks have multiple issues with Syria, Kurds, F-35 deliveries, etc.

The Americans would make an issue over Brunson, a Protestant apostate, but if he were Christian Orthodox, they would likely let him rot in hell like they do all Orthodox Christians in their foreign policy in Eastern Europe and the Middle East…..  What business does a person like Brunson have in Turkey??? On that point, the Turks have a point that Brunson was probably a front for some kind of dirty work.

These thoughts this morning led me to think about how differently Russia, Greece and Turkey have gone separate paths in the space of Endiamese Perioche. 

·    Greece has given up anything to do with its Byzantine heritage and today has moved to become willingly a Balkan economic and political protectorate under the EU.  Greeks crave to be Westerners.  They are passing laws and pursuing policies that make Greece a multicultural society to absorb the flood of illegal migrants, restrict the Christian Orthodox faith and they are pushing their young and educated to emigrate.  The Greek diaspora and business communities that flourished in the Black Sea, Asia Minor and Middle East have withered and disappeared.
·         
    Turkey has become a regional power.  It has developed a serious industrial base and become a major exporter of both industrial goods, textiles and agricultural commodities.  Under Erdogan, Turkey has rediscovered its Ottoman roots and is asserting itself in the region geopolitically.
·         
    Russia survived 70 years of Bolshevik upheaval, the collapse of the Soviet Union and dissolution under Yeltsin.  Today under Putin, Russia has rediscovered its national identity and traditions. The Christian Orthodox faith is flourishing with new churches.  Despite the incursions of the EU/ US in the Ukraine, Russia is reasserting itself geopolitically in the Far East with China as well as the Middle East on Syria.

One major theme is how each country faced the Marxist ideology and Bolshevism, which was a major source of political upheaval in the 20th Century. 

·        Bolshevism is a Western ideology.  It has German-Jewish roots from the 19th century.  It evolved into Social Democracy and created the roots of Globalism.  For that reason, the political left embraced the European Union.  The propagators of Bolshevism in Russia and Greece were originally predominately Jewish.  Their aim from the start was to eradicate any trace of national identity, Byzantine heritage and Christian Orthodox faith.  They never accepted the Greek presence in Macedonia.
·         
      The Germans during WW1, imposed the Bolsheviks on Russia to destabilize the Czar, immobilize the Russian imperial army so they could free up the Eastern Front to face the British and French.  The Russian Imperial Army had successes with the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian Empire but a series of setbacks on the German front.  The German government spent the equivalent of one billion dollars in today’s money to finance the Bolsheviks.  The Bolsheviks initially used non-Russian forces like the Latvian guard to seize power.  Their regime committed numerous atrocities and essentially demolished Russia, which at the turn of the 20th Century was an incredibly thriving culture.
·        
    Greeks like Plastiras and Pangalos who experienced Crimea, which was the last stand of the White Russian/ former Imperial Army forces, became deeply anti-Communist for what they saw.  Later on in the Greek-Turkish war, they lived the efforts of the SEKE to demoralize Greek troops and encourage them to desert.
·         
     The Greek Communists created havoc in Greece in the 1920’s and 1930’s. Essentially they poisoned Greek political life.  Metaxas was a brief parenthesis to cleanse Greece and reestablish a national identity, but that ended quickly with the German occupation and chaos of the Greek civil war. The Greek communists lost the Greek Civil war but have dominated Greek cultural and political life since 1974.  Of course, cultural Marxism generally remains in the West the predominate ideology both in the US and EU, particularly in the media and university systems.
·         
   Turkey escaped Bolshevism due to Kemal. Marxism never flourished as an ideology. Kemal westernized Turkey on his own terms sui generis, but as in the case of Russia, Turkey is now rediscovering its Ottoman heritage and moving away from the West.

So we have Russia and Turkey, who are rediscovering their history and national identity, but Greece abandoning national identity. We have Russia and Turkey as successors to the Byzantines, but Greece counter to Gennadios wanting to be an entirely ‘Western European’ country even on the basis of protectorate status.

I hardly see under the present circumstances, why Russia or Turkey would cede anything to Greece or consider Greece as an example to them.  Conversely, the Greeks could learn a lot by the Russian example post-Yeltsin to rid themselves of cultural Marxism and reaffirm their Byzantine and Christian Orthodox heritage, but there no sign that that is likely to happen.

Whatever there was of the Eastern Party in Greece is dead.

                               Diran  Majarian                               13 October 2018



How Greeks from the civilized and wealthy Byzantine-Ottoman Ecumenical Empire
 fell into the status of a Third World African Country 
by craving to become European (See. L.S. Stavrianos, The Third World Comes of Age, 
Morrow)


Δευτέρα 1 Οκτωβρίου 2018

6 - Why the Roman (Ottoman) Empire under Süleyman the Great was more tolerant than under the Roman Byzantine) Empire under Justinian the Great : The case of Armenia, one of the founder nations of the Ottoman Ecumenical Empire

1461- The Founding of the Armenian Millet-Patriarchate in Constantinople

6 - Why the Roman (Ottoman) Empire under Süleyman the Great was more tolerant than under the Roman Byzantine) Empire under Justinian the Great : The case of Armenia, one of the founder nations of the Ottoman Ecumenical Empire

(I just received the following letter from a good friend and distinguished Armenian (as well as American and Greek), Diran Majarian, mourning today the death of Charles Aznavour, at the age of 94. Aznavour was an Armenian like Diran and a Frenchman like myself. Dimitri Kitsikis)

Dimitris: This morning we celebrated Agios Grigorios in church.  The Armenian Church separated from the other churches from the 4th Ecumenical Council.  In fact, the Armenians were at war with the Persians, who wanted to force them to abandon their Christianity to become Zoroastrians like they were.  They were unable to send any representative.  The Byzantines would forbid any Armenian Churches in Constantinople for centuries thereafter.  The Armenians occupying key positions in Byzantium were largely Hayirum like myself – they belonged to the Byzantine Church.

After the fall of Constantinople, the agreement with Gennadios led to the Greek Millet.  The Greeks correctly preferring the Ottomans to the West to keep the Orthodox faith intact.  The Turks called the Armenians and offered to them a similar arrangement.  The first Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople was Hovakim I (Ἰωακείμ Α΄), who was at the time the Metropolitan of Bursa. In 1461, he was brought to Constantinople by Sultan Mehmed II and established as the Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople.  Armenians were permitted freely to build their churches that the Byzantines had forbidden.

The current Armenia - which is Eastern Armenia - was part of Persia until the 1828, when the Russians conquered the space along with Azerbaijan from the Persians. They had taken the space earlier from the Ottomans.  Ever since the Armenians have had a very close relation with the Russians.  The Russians recruited heavily Armenians to fight the Ottomans in WW1 and the biggest, bloodiest Ottoman defeat was the Battle of Sarıkamış by a Russian-Armenian army.  This disastrous defeat under mainly Armenians enraged the three Pashas and is one of the basic factors - never discussed - in the Armenian Genocide. 

The Bolshevik revolution financed and supported by the Germans resulted in Brest Litovsk.  This was a disaster for the Ottoman Greeks and Armenians stranded with the Russian withdrawal.  Eventually Lenin recognizing and arming Kemal that led to the defeat of the Greeks in Asia Minor.

I will never understand why the Greeks love so much the Bolsheviks, the KKE, etc.  I have enormous respect for the Russians, who survived the Bolsheviks, restored their Orthodox Christianity and national identity.  The Greeks have done the opposite with the EU and surrendered national identity, ironically under a SYRIZA government who are successors of the Bolsheviks. They are as culturally Greek as Jehovah’s witnesses have any relation to Orthodox Christianity.  A major reason in my mind why Greece in its current state could never play the elder father to the Russians.  The Russians would never take them seriously, especially with a government of Orthodox apostates and declared Atheists totally beholden to the EU as a protectorate.  Not exactly as basis for respect that Ioannis Metaxas considered so important in international relations.

 Currently in Istanbul, there are at least 5 to 10 times more Armenians than Greeks as well as an enormous number of Armenian migrants.  The current Armenian Patriarch Mesrob II Mutafyan suffers Alzheimer disease and is incapacitated.  In his place was appointed a caretaker Aram Ateşyan.  The Armenian Synod decided to retire the Patriarch Mesrob II Mutafyan on October 26, 2016 and to organize an election for a new patriarch, which the Turkish State under Erdogan has been blocking.  Erdogan prefers Ateşyan, with whom he has extremely good relations and does not want him to leave.In essence, the Millet system remains in part and Erdogan acts accordingly.    

Diran Majarian                                                          October 1, 2018